CRUSADER KINGS 2 PLUS EXPORT TO EU4 MODS

Trying to judge objectively I consider CK2 the better game so I vote for that. Hell, even France plays pretty differently from England and Spain, whereas in CKII they'd play very similarly. EU, instead, plays quite differently if you're a small landlocked nation in the HRE or a huge colonial power, a tribe in the new world or a state in Asia. At most, I've found merchant republics had slightly different gameplay, but that's it. It tends to play pretty similar wherever you are and whoever you are. Marry a rich heiress with claims and good traits, father a son, land based combat, take land and lose land. I like both, but EU (from EUII) was my first love and is my favourite. Most distressingly, the vassal-liege relationship is handled almost entirely though the setting of a crown law which means that everyone, from the Holy Roman Empire to the Fatimid Caliphate, quickly ratchets up to whatever crown law level (out of five) they want and the only way it changes is if the liege loses to a rebellion formed to preemptively lower it, rather than in response to any particular action by the liege. Crusader Kings 2 has a character focus and pretensions about how important the relations between characters is, but all you can influence about that relationship is a single number with precious few ways to influence it. It's definitely not perfect (if your war is overseas you won't get enough war score from battles to get any kind of satisfying conclusion to the war), but its mechanics all work very well for building up a nation's power through the ages. I like EU4 much better, because it understands that it's a map painter. It is more difficult to imagine myself as the country of England than it is William the Conqueror. The story of EU4 is more straight-forward. This helps create more immersion and a story. It's not a straight up Grand Strategy like EU 4 and the RPG element is implemented really well. This makes the game one of the greatest genre-bending games. You intuitively identify with, root for and despise the different characters in the game. I would say that that CK 2 is prefered and the better game because it presents more interesting choices.EU 4 is a great game, and I will probably sink 400 + hours into it, but CK2 I wouldn't not be surprised if I hit 1000 some day.CK2 is part RPG.

CRUSADER KINGS 2 PLUS EXPORT TO EU4 MODS

In CK2 playing a a Catholic kingdom is somewhat different than playing a Muslim, and then playing a Republic is totally different, and as a tribal realm is quite different as well, and then you have transformation mods like Game of Thrones, so on the aspect of playing more hours, CK2 provides more variations. In EU4 the difference between a country and another is mostly at the start, the location and if you need to westernize or not. It really is an unanswerable question to me, it's like if you have two kids and I asked you which one you love the most, sort of.If you said 'You're going to be left on a deserted island with power but no Internet, with a computer that can only have one game in it, which game would you install', I guess I would go for CK2, only because it has more different gameplays. Europa Universalis 4 Vs Crusader Kings 2 Wiki.I doubt I'll stop playing CK2 just beacuse EUIV was released. Crusader Kings II and Europa Universalis IV have enough significant differences that I think they can peacefully coexist. Crusader Kings 2, Hearts of Iron IV, and Europa Universalis IV all get expansions this year Paradox have far more DLC in store for all their big games, including Crusader Kings II, Hearts of Iron. One can export a saved game from Crusader Kings II and import it into Europa Universalis IV with the EU4 Save Converter DLC. There is no way to form Trapalanda directly in Europa Universalis IV. Crusader Kings II CKII: Sunset Invasion (with the setting Aztec Invasion activated) EU4 Save Converter Creation mechanics.

Crusader kings 2 plus export to eu4